|Year : 2017 | Volume
| Issue : 3 | Page : 123-132
Correlation of tear film-specific immunoglobulin E assay with the skin prick test in allergic conjunctivitis
Basem M Ibrahim1, Randa S Abdel-Latif2
1 Department of Ophthalmology, Zagazig University, Zagazig, Egypt
2 Department of Medical Microbiology and Immunology, Zagazig University, Zagazig, Egypt
|Date of Submission||17-Apr-2017|
|Date of Acceptance||01-Jul-2017|
|Date of Web Publication||17-Oct-2017|
Basem M Ibrahim
Department of Ophthalmology, Faculty of Medicine, Zagazig University, Zagazig 44519
Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None
Purpose The aim of this study was to investigate the correlation and validity of tear film allergen-specific immunoglobulin E (IgE) in relation to the skin prick test in diagnosing different types of allergic conjunctivitis.
Design The study design was a prospective randomized case series.
Patients and methods One hundred and twenty patients with allergic conjunctivitis were included in this study and were classified into four groups according to the type of allergy. Group 1 included 48 patients with perennial allergic conjunctivitis. Group 2 included 35 patients with seasonal allergic conjunctivitis. Group 3 included 30 patients with vernal keratoconjunctivitis (VKC), and group 4 included seven patients with atopic keratoconjunctivitis. All patients were subjected to the skin prick test, which was performed with aeroallergen panel using kits containing different inhalant allergens, positive control (histamine 1 mg/ml), and negative control (saline 0.9%). Tear samples were collected using the microcapillary method for the quantitative determination of specific IgE using immune blot assay. Data were evaluated and statistically analyzed.
Results In this study, the skin prick test and specific IgE were performed to 11 different allergens and the results revealed that the most common mixed allergens were mixed pollen, mixed mould, and mixed mite. Validity of tear film-specific IgE in the detection of allergens was assessed against the skin prick test (gold standard). There was IgE specificity of 100%, whereas the sensitivity ranged from 50 to 100% to the three common allergens in the four groups. There was a statistically significant correlation between specific IgE and the skin prick test for the most common allergens in patients with perennial allergic conjunctivitis, seasonal allergic conjunctivitis, and VKC (except for mould allergens in the VKC group). There was only a statistically significant correlation between specific IgE and the skin prick test for mite allergen in patients with atopic keratoconjunctivitis.
Conclusion Tear film-specific IgE has a statistically significant correlation and validity when compared with the skin prick test in diagnosing the causative allergen in different types of allergic conjunctivitis. It could be a good alternative to the skin prick test in the diagnosis of allergic conjunctivitis with high sensitivity and specificity and fewer complications and limitations.
Keywords: allergic conjunctivitis, skin prick test, specific immunoglobulin E, tear film
|How to cite this article:|
Ibrahim BM, Abdel-Latif RS. Correlation of tear film-specific immunoglobulin E assay with the skin prick test in allergic conjunctivitis. Delta J Ophthalmol 2017;18:123-32
|How to cite this URL:|
Ibrahim BM, Abdel-Latif RS. Correlation of tear film-specific immunoglobulin E assay with the skin prick test in allergic conjunctivitis. Delta J Ophthalmol [serial online] 2017 [cited 2020 May 31];18:123-32. Available from: http://www.djo.eg.net/text.asp?2017/18/3/123/216926
| Introduction|| |
Conjunctivitis, accounting for 14% of all eye diseases, is considered one of the most common eye diseases in general ophthalmic practice. Its causes include infections with bacteria and viruses, and allergic conjunctivitis .
The prevalence of ocular allergies is estimated to be over 20% in the USA and 18% in the UK .
Allergic conjunctivitis could be categorized as seasonal allergic conjunctivitis (SAC), perennial allergic conjunctivitis (PAC), vernal keratoconjunctivitis (VKC), and atopic keratoconjunctivitis (AKC) . A proper etiological diagnosis of allergic conjunctivitis will result in consequent efficacious treatment. This justifies close cooperation between two specialists, ophthalmologists, and allergists to achieve this goal.
Diagnosis of an allergic disease is principally based on history and clinical examination, and can be confirmed by means of skin prick tests (SPT) or measurement of antigen-specific immunoglobulin E (IgE) levels ,,. Specific IgE-mediated allergic reactivity can simply be tested for using either an in-vivo SPT or an in-vitro enzyme or fluorescence-based immunoassay, commonly called a radioallergosorbent test .
Numerous epidemiologic studies have verified strong associations among serum IgE levels and skin test reactivity to different allergens, yet the details of these relations are still not clear ,,,.
Allergen-specific IgE testing is commonly used in the diagnosis of IgE-mediated atopic diseases, but there is still a debate about the relative value of in-vitro measurement of IgE antibody in comparison with in-vivo skin tests .
This study was planned to investigate the correlation and validity of tear film allergen-specific IgE in relation to the SPT in different types of allergic conjunctivitis.
| Patients and methods|| |
This study was carried out between May 2016 and January 2017.
The study was approved by the Local Ethical Committee of Zagazig University. Written consent was obtained from the patients and included an explanation of the study.
This is a randomized prospective study to correlate and assess the validity of tear film-specific IgE assay in relation to the SPT in allergic conjunctivitis.
One hundred and forty-eight patients with suspected allergic conjunctivitis (history of itching, red eye, swollen eyelids, foreign body sensation, and lacrimation) were examined with a slit lamp biomicroscopy for confirmation of the diagnosis of allergic conjunctivitis and for determination of its type. The exclusion criteria were viral conjunctivitis, bacterial conjunctivitis, giant papillary conjunctivitis, and toxic conjunctivitis.
Classification of allergic conjunctivitis was carried out after clinical examination and history taking as follows.
Seasonal allergic conjunctivitis
Diagnostic aspects of SAC consist of itching, redness, and chemosis. Redness, or conjunctival injection, tends to be mild to moderate, whereas chemosis is usually moderate, and itching is a somewhat constant symptom of SAC. However, corneal involvement is rare .
Airborne pollens are usually the causative allergens in SAC. Manifestations usually occur in summer and spring, and lessen in the winter months .
Perennial allergic conjunctivitis
Diagnostic features of SAC and PAC are similar, but the allergens to which the patient is allergic are different. In PAC the allergens are present throughout the year and the allergy is perennial with exposure to these allergens .
VKC has three clinical forms, palpebral, limbal, and mixed, with an overall majority in male population. Young people are usually affected. Symptoms include ocular itching, redness, swelling, and discharge. Itching may be very severe. Patients have frequently photophobia, sometimes quite severe. The most characteristic sign is giant papillae (cobblestone-like swellings) on the upper tarsal conjunctiva, usually 10–20 in number .
The cornea may be affected in VKC. A punctate keratitis can occur and may coalesce to form an opacity. This frequently leads to a grayish or whitish subepithelial plaque. Trantas dots may be seen at the limbus .
Eczematous skin lesions (red and elevated) are characteristic and may be found on the eyelids, or any place on the body. Ocular findings vary. There may be mild-to-severe chemosis and conjunctival injection. Conjunctival scarring is familiar. Trantas dots, giant papillae may also be present and cataracts may also occur in AKC .
One hundred and twenty patients met the inclusion criteria and provided informed consent. These patients were classified into four groups according to the type of allergy as follows: group 1included patients with PAC; group 2 included patients with SAC; group 3 included patients with VKC; group 4 included patients with AKC.
The patients’ demographic data, clinical data, and history were recorded.
The patients were instructed to avoid antihistamines (first generation: 3 days; second generation: 5 days), systemic corticosteroids (6 days), and mast cell stabilizers (2 days) before testing, as these medications can affect the interpretation of both the SPT and IgE assay.
All patients were subjected to the following: SPT, tear sampling, and measurement of tear-specific IgE.
Skin prick test
A routine SPT was performed with aeroallergen panel using kits containing different inhalant allergens, negative control (saline 0.9%), and positive control (histamine 1 mg/ml).
The kit of aeroallergen panel includes the following inhalant allergens supplied in 5 ml vials (Omega Laboratory, Montreal, Canada): mixed pollen (grass, birch, and ragweed), mixed mould (Aspergillus fumigatus, Aspergillus niger, and Alternaria spp.), mixed mite (Dermatophagoides pteronyssinus and Dermatophagoides farina), Candida albicans, dog epithelium, cat epithelium, feather mix, cockroach, hay dust, house dust, and smoke.
A drop of solution of each test allergen and control was placed on the flexor surface of the forearm, and skin was pricked at the drop midpoint.
SPT was considered positive if the induration was larger than the control by 3 mm or more after 15 min. A larger wheal means greater allergic response .
The reactions were recorded in accordance with the recommendations of the Standardization Committee of the Northern Society of Allergology, as shown in [Table 1] .
The microcapillary method ([Figure 1]) was used to collect tear samples from the temporal side of tear meniscus without local anesthesia. The patient was asked to look in the opposite direction during sampling and not to blink .
Measurement of tear-specific immunoglobulin E
Immune blot assay was used for the quantitative determination of specific IgE in tear samples against aeroallergen (same allergens used in the SPT) and antigoat IgG as positive control with Allergy Screen Panel 2A EGY (MEDIWISS Analytic GmbH, Hanover, Germany) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Briefly, the tears were pipetted into a trough of nitrocellulose membrane coated with specific allergens, followed by addition of biotin-coupled anti-human IgE antibody, streptavidin conjugated with alkaline phosphatase, and substrate, in order. The color reaction of each precipitate line on the test trough indicated specific antibody content. Tear-specific IgE was analyzed with Rapid Reader (Improvio, Germany) using the densitometer curve of the membrane and concentration data for each intensity. The result was expressed in IU/ml and classified into six classes ([Table 2]) reflecting allergen-specific IgE content of the tears according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The test was valid if positive control IgE was more than 3.5 IU/ml.
|Table 2 Relationship between the classes found and allergen-specific immunoglobulin E content|
Click here to view
The collected data were coded and analyzed with computer using a database software program, statistical package for the social sciences, version 19 (SPSS Inc., IBM Company, New York, USA).
For quantitative variables, mean, SD, and range (minimum and maximum) were computed. Independent t-test was used for quantitative normally distributed data for detecting the difference between two different groups. The χ2 and Fisher’s exact tests were used to detect the relation between different qualitative variables. Correlation estimates the amount of dependency of one factor on the other; the closeness of the association was measured by the correlation coefficient (r). The value of r ranges from +1 to −1. A test of significance (t-test for correlation) was used to test the level of significance of the association (to measure the P-value).
Validity included the following: sensitivity, which was defined as the proportion of participants with the disease who have a positive test for the disease; specificity, which was defined by the proportion of participants without the disease who have a negative test for the disease; positive predictive value, which was defined as the probability of disease in patients with a positive test result; negative predictive value, which was defined as the probability of not having the disease when the test result was negative; and accuracy, which is the proportion of all test results, whether positive or negative, which were correct.
| Results|| |
One hundred and twenty patients with allergic conjunctivitis were enrolled in this study. The male-to-female ratio in general was 1.26 (56% male and 44% female) and the mean age was 21.3 years (range: 7–48 years). The exception for this was VKC in which there was a significant male dominance (73%) and younger age with a mean of 11.5 years. Forty-five percent of all cases were students and 70% were from rural areas. The majority (40%) of the patients had PAC, 29% had SAC, 25% had VKC, and 6% had AKC.
Sixty percent of the patients had a positive family history of allergy, of whom 37% had allergic rhinitis, 30% had allergic conjunctivitis, 24% had bronchial asthma, and 9% had atopic dermatitis ([Table 3]).
|Table 3 Comparison between different studied groups in relation to age, sex, and family history|
Click here to view
There was a statistically significant difference in age and sex distribution in the VKC group with respect to the other groups.
Some allergic diseases can be associated with allergic conjunctivitis ([Table 4]).
In this study, the SPT and specific IgE were performed to 11 different allergens and the results revealed that the most common allergens were mixed pollen, mixed mould, and mixed mite ([Figure 2]).
|Figure 2 Bar chart showing the number of positive cases of the skin prick test and specific immunoglobulin E (IgE) to different allergens.|
Click here to view
There was a statistically significant difference in grading results of the SPT, in which few cases were of grade 1 and no cases exceeded grade 4. No cases were positive to mixed mould in the AKC group, neither for the SPT nor for the IgE specific test ([Table 5]).
There was no statistically significant difference in IgE level to the most common allergens in the studied groups except for the SAC group. No cases were positive to mixed mould in the AKC group, neither for the SPT nor for the IgE-specific test ([Table 6]).
|Table 6 Classes of specific immunoglobulin E level to the most common allergens|
Click here to view
Validity of tear film-specific IgE in the detection of allergens inducing different types of allergic conjunctivitis was assessed against the SPT, which was used as a gold standard in this field ([Table 7],[Table 8],[Table 9],[Table 10]).
|Table 7 Validity of detection of specific-immunoglobulin E test in the diagnosis of patients with perennial allergic conjunctivitis|
Click here to view
|Table 8 Validity of detection of specific immunoglobulin E test in the diagnosis of patients with seasonal allergic conjunctivitis|
Click here to view
|Table 9 Validity of detection of specific immunoglobulin E test in the diagnosis of patients with vernal keratoconjunctivitis|
Click here to view
|Table 10 Validity of detection of specific immunoglobulin test in the diagnosis of patients with atopic keratoconjunctivitis|
Click here to view
There was IgE specificity of 100% and sensitivity ranging from 74 to 100% to the three conmen allergens in the PAC group ([Table 7]).
There was IgE specificity of 100% and sensitivity ranging from 77 to 97% to the three conmen allergens in the SAC group ([Table 8]).
There was IgE specificity of 100% and sensitivity ranging from 50% to 100% to the 3 conmen allergens in the VKC group ([Table 9]).
There was IgE specificity of 100% to mite and sensitivity ranging from 86% for pollen to 100% for mite in the AKC group ([Table 10]).
Correlations between the specific IgE test and the SPT in the studied groups are shown in [Table 11],[Table 12],[Table 13],[Table 14],[Table 15] and demonstrated in [Figure 3],[Figure 4],[Figure 5],[Figure 6].
|Table 11 Correlation between the specific immunoglobulin E test and the skin prick test in patients with perennial allergic conjunctivitis|
Click here to view
|Table 12 Correlation between the specific immunoglobulin E test and the skin prick test in patients with seasonal allergic conjunctivitis|
Click here to view
|Table 13 Correlation between the specific immunoglobulin E test and the skin prick test in patient with vernal keratoconjunctivitis|
Click here to view
|Table 14 Correlation between the specific immunoglobulin E test and the skin prick test in patients with atopic keratoconjunctivitis|
Click here to view
|Table 15 Correlation between the specific immunoglobulin E test and the skin prick test in all studied groups|
Click here to view
|Figure 3 Correlation between the specific immunoglobulin E (IgE) test and the skin prick test in patients with perennial allergic conjunctivitis.|
Click here to view
|Figure 4 Correlation between the specific immunoglobulin E (IgE) test and the skin prick test in patients with seasonal allergic conjunctivitis.|
Click here to view
|Figure 5 Correlation between the specific immunoglobulin E (IgE) test and the skin prick test in patients with vernal keratoconjunctivitis.|
Click here to view
|Figure 6 Correlation between the specific immunoglobulin E (IgE) test and the skin prick test in patients with atopic keratoconjunctivitis.|
Click here to view
There was a statistically significant correlation between the specific IgE test and the SPT in patients with Perennial allergic conjunctivitis (PAC) ([Table 11] and [Figure 3]).
There was a statistically significant correlation between the specific IgE test and the SPT in patients with SAC ([Table 12] and [Figure 4]).
There was a statistically significant correlation between the specific IgE test and the SPT in patients with VKC except for mould allergen ([Table 13] and [Figure 5]).
There was only a statistically significant correlation between the specific IgE test and the SPT for mite allergen in patients with AKC ([Table 14] and [Figure 6]).
There was a statistically significant correlation between the specific IgE test and the SPT in all studied groups ([Table 15]).
| Discussion|| |
Allergic diseases have dramatically increased in the last decades . Ocular allergy represents one of the most common ocular conditions encountered in clinical practice .
Allergic conjunctivitis diseases are among the main ocular surface disorders primarily caused by type I allergic reaction. Allergic conjunctivitis diseases are classified into four clinical forms: SAC, PAC, VKC, and AKC .
PAC and SAC are the most common types of ocular allergies and are said to affect at least 15–20% of the population . In the present study, the majority (40%) of the patients had PAC, 29% had SAC, 25% had VKC, and 6% had AKC.
In this study, the most common accompanying allergic disease was allergic rhinitis followed by bronchial asthma and eczema, although eczema was the most common accompanying allergic disease among patients with AKC. This is in accordance with Kocatürk et al. , who found that 73.7% of their patients had allergic rhinitis. Higher percentages of associated allergic rhinitis were found by Hesselmar et al. (88%)  and Kosrirukvongs et al. (92%) . As patients with allergic conjunctivitis often present with varying symptoms of rhinitis, many studies usually use unspecific terms such as hay fever or allergic rhinoconjunctivitis for such allergies .
Approximately half of the patients had a family history of other allergic conditions such as allergic rhinitis, atopic dermatitis, and asthma . In the present study, 60% of the patients had a positive family history of allergy. This may indicate the role of the genetic factors in the development of allergic rhinoconjunctivitis .
The diagnosis of ocular allergy is primarily clinical, but there are laboratory tests that can be useful in supporting the diagnosis. Allergists can perform skin testing for specific allergens using SPT or intradermal injections of allergen .
Skin testing represents the primary diagnostic tool in allergy and is considered the gold standard in this field. It is used to confirm that a specific allergen has induced an IgE antibody response .
In-vitro tests for IgE antibodies to specific allergens are widely used . IgE has been considered to play an important role in allergic reactions in the eye; thus, they can be used in diagnosing allergic conjunctivitis .
This study was conducted to measure tear IgE concentrations in different types of allergic conjunctivitis and to detect the sensitivity and specificity of this test in relation to the SPT (gold standard).
Usually, diagnosis of allergic diseases is performed by measuring serum IgE concentration. However, this does not differentiate between local and systemic allergy .
Inflammatory cells have a very essential function in regulating IgE production at local levels in reactions such as allergic conjunctivitis. Locally formed IgE combines with the antigen and attaches to the surface of local mast cells. Subsequently, these cells move into the systemic circulation, and, although local concentrations of IgE may be high, systemic concentrations will be extremely low .
Friedlaender et al.  found that measurement of IgE in tear samples is not only useful for the diagnosis of allergic conjunctivitis but also for the assessment of the severity of the allergy.
In the present study, there were strong correlations between the level of specific IgE using Immune blot assay for the tear samples and the results of the SPT (r=0.871, 0.839, 0.790, and 0.829) in the studied groups, respectively, with a P-value less than 0.05 in all studied groups. This is in accordance with Wohrl et al. , who found that the agreement between the in-vitro-specific IgE antibody assays and SPT results was between 85 and 95%. In addition, Demir et al.  found that, except for mould, all allergens had significant correlations between their specific IgE levels and skin test positivity. Cho et al.  stated that there was 81–97% agreement between SPT and individual specific IgE test in allergen detection.
The sensitivity and specificity of immunoassays for IgE differ with the system being used and the quality of the allergen. Overall IgE sensitivity ranges from 60 to 95% and specificity from 30 to 95% ,. In the current study, there was a high sensitivity to pollen (91.42, 96.77, 92, and 85.71%) and mite (100, 86.66, 100, and 100%) in the four groups, respectively, a high sensitivity to mould (74.07, 76.92, and 50%) in the first three groups, respectively, (no allergy to mould was seen in the AKC group), and a high specificity to pollen (100, 100, 100, and 100%) and mite (100, 100, 100, and 100%) in the four groups, respectively, and to mould (100, 100, and 100%) in the first three groups, respectively, (no allergy to mould was seen in the AKC group). This is in accordance with the results of Attia et al. , who found that the statistical evaluation results as regards commercial specific IgE sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value were 93.1, 88.9, 96.2, and 93.7%, respectively. Williams et al.  recorded values of more than 90% sensitivity and 100% specificity for specific IgE of pollens of common grasses and trees, dust mites, and cat allergens.
In contrast to the current study results, Popiel et al.  found that the sensitivity of the group of home dust mites was 85% and specificity was only 40%, and, in case of the group of storage mites, the sensitivity was on the level of as much as 90.24% and the specificity, however, was only on the level of 25%. The sensitivity is quite high. Unfortunately, the specificity of these tests is deficient in their study.
Skin tests are the most clinically appropriate techniques in the evaluation of allergic patients by determinations of IgE-mediated hypersensitivity because of their ease, natural relevance in the patient’s own skin, low cost, high sensitivity, and little time of performance . Skin tests as with other physiologic procedures necessitate a degree of expertise by the observer to both interpret the results and link them with the history and physical findings. As with other diagnostic studies, inappropriately performed or interpreted skin test can lead to false-positive or false-negative results. However, cutaneous responsiveness varies between patients, and hence positive result will be clearer in some patients than others. Thus, other factors may play a role in correct interpretation, such as patient’s history and the patient’s response to antigens and controls .
There are many other limitations to skin testing. For example, skin testing should generally be performed on normal skin and the test should be performed with a physician available to treat side effects, including anaphylaxis .
Antihistamines, tricyclic antidepressant , and some tranquilizers suppress the wheal and flare response and should be discontinued before allergy testing for up to 10–19 days or even more . Skin testing in patients taking beta blocking agents has a risk of an exaggerated adverse reaction .
Skin test sensitivity may be altered by long-term corticosteroid treatment but short-time treatment does not have the same effect. As regards pregnancy, SPT is safe, but if adverse reaction occurs, such as anaphylaxis, the fetus might be adversely affected .
Skin test reactions can vary with age, with infants and older adults having less reactivity. In addition, patients need to be old enough to be able to cooperate with testing . Skin test reactions may be more difficult to interpret in patients with dark skin or any cutaneous lesion that may interfere with the skin test reactivity . Some patients with chronic diseases such as diabetes, renal failure, cancer, and spinal cord injuries may have a decrease in skin sensitivity .
All of the above-mentioned limitations to skin test should redirect the allergists’ and ophthalmologists’ attention to the other more simple and convenient tests such as specific IgE testing in the tear film, especially if it is easy and have a good correlation and validity in relation to skin testing.
| Conclusion|| |
Tear film-specific IgE has a statistically significant correlation and validity when compared with the SPT in diagnosing the causative allergen in different types of allergic conjunctivitis. Tear IgE concentrations can be measured in small tear samples easily and less frightening, especially to a young patient and not affected by patients age, skin lesions, skin color, and chronic diseases. Therefore, tear-specific IgE could be a good alternative to SPT in the diagnosis of allergic conjunctivitis with high sensitivity and specificity and fewer complications and limitations.
Basem M. Ibrahim contributed to the design, definition of intellectual content, literature search, clinical studies, data acquisition, data analysis, manuscript preparation, manuscript editing, and manuscript review. Randa S. Abdel-Latif contributed to the concept, design, literature search, experimental studies, data acquisition, data analysis, statistical analysis, and manuscript review.
Financial support and sponsorship
Conflicts of interest
There are no conflicts of interest.
| References|| |
Dumavibhat P, Sri Supan V, Yenjit W, Hanson KT. Research strategy: ophthalmic diseases. In: Bharnarapravati N, Ton tisirin K, Porapakkham Y, editors. Strategic plan for health research. Bangkok: PA Living Co.; 1998. pp. 194–211.
Bielory L, Katelaris CH, Lightman S, Naclerio RM. Treating the ocular component of allergic rhinoconjunctivitis and related eye disorders. Med Gen Med 2007; 9:35.
Pepose JS, Holland GN, Welhelmus KR, editors. Ocular infection and immunity. St Louis: Mosby; 1996. pp. 345–390.
Stazi MA, Sampogna F, Montagano G, Grandolfo ME, Couilliot MF, Annesi-Maesano I. Early life factors related to clinical manifestations of atopic disease but not to skin-prick test positivity in young children. Pediatr Allergy Immunol 2002; 13:105–112.
Holt PG. Development of sensitization versus tolerance to inhalant allergens during early life. Pediatr Pulmonol Suppl 1997; 16:6–7.
Oryszczyn MP, Annesi-Maesano I, Campagna D, Sahuquillo V, Huel G, Kauffmann F. Head circumference at birth and maternal factors related to cord blood total IgE. Clin Exp Allergy 1999; 29:334–337.
O’Brien RM. Skin prick testing and in vitro assays for allergic sensitivity. Aust Prescr 2002; 25:91–93.
Celedon JC, Soto-Quiros ME, Hanson LA, Weiss ST. The relationship among markers of allergy, asthma, allergic rhinitis, and eczema in Costa Rica. Pediatr Allergy Immunol 2002; 13:91–97.
Burrows B, Martinez FD, Cline MG, Lebowitz MD. The relationship between parental and children’s serum IgE and asthma. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 1995; 152:1497–1500.
Freidhoff LR, Marsh DG. Relationship among asthma, serum IgE levels and skin test sensitivity to inhaled allergens. Int Arch Allergy Immunol 1993; 100:355–361.
Freidhoff LR, Meyers DA, Marsh DG. A genetic epidemiologic study of human immune responsiveness to allergens in an industrial population. The associations among skin sensitivity, total serum IgE, age, sex, and the reporting of allergies in a stratified random sample. J Allergy Clin Immunol 1984; 73:490–499.
Khadadah ME, Onadeko BO, Ezeamuzie CI, Mattok BY. Studies of the relationship between allergen-specific IgE antibodies and skin test reactivity in patients with asthma in Kuwait. Med Principles Pract 2000; 9:260–267.
Friedlander MH. Ocular allergy. Curr Opin Allergy Clin Immunol 2011; 11:477–482.
Bielory L, Frohman L. Allergic and immunologic disorders of the eye. J Allergy Clin Immunol 1992; 86:1–20.
Bielory B, Bielory L. Atopic dermatitis and keratoconjunctivitis. Immunol Allergy Clin North Am 2010; 30:323–336.
Kocatürk T, Kocatürk O, Dayanir V., EliaCIk K. Skin prick test and immunotherapy in children with allergic eye disease. Turk J Med Sci 2012; 42:485–490.
Aas K, Belin L. Standardization of diagnostic work in allergy. Int Arch Allergy Appl Immunol 1973; 45:57–60.
Nomura K, Takamura E. Tear IgE concentrations in allergic conjunctivitis. Eye 1998; 12:296–298.
Verlato G, Corsico A, Villani S, Cerveri I, Migliore E, Accordini S et al.
Is the prevalence of adult asthma and allergic rhinitis still increasing. Results of an Italian study. J Allergy Clin Immunol 2003; 111:1232–1238.
La Rosa M, Lionetti E, Reibaldi M, Russo A, Longo A, Leonardi S et al.
Allergic conjunctivitis: a comprehensive review of the literature. Italian J Ped 2013; 39:18.
Hesselmar B, Aberg B, Eriksson B, Aberg N. Allergic rhinoconjunctivitis, eczema, and sensitization in two areas with differing climates. Pediatr Allergy Immunol 2001; 12:208–215.
Kosrirukvongs P, Visitsunthorn N, Vichyanond P, Vichyanond P, Bunnag C. Allergic conjunctivitis. Asian Pac J Allergy Immunol 2001; 19:237–244.
Gradman J, Wolthers OD. Allergic conjunctivitis in children with asthma, rhinitis and eczema in a secondary outpatient clinic. Pediatr Allergy Immunol 2006; 17:524–526.
Fokkens W, Lund V, Bachert C, Clement P, Helllings P, Holmstrom M et al.
EAACI position paper on rhinosinusitis and nasal polyps executive summary. Allergy 2005; 60:583–601
Allergy Diagnosis in Clinical Practice. A practice parameter. Joint Task Force on Practice Parameters representing the American Academy of Allergy, Asthma & Immunology, the American College of Allergy, Asthma and Immunology, and the Joint Council on Allergy, Asthma and Immunology. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol 2006; 104:97–111.
Kari O, Salo O, Bjorksten F, Backman E. Allergic conjunctivitis, total and specific IgE in the tear fluid. Acta Ophthalmol (Copenh) 1985; 63:97–99.
Stone KD, Prussin C, Metcalfe DD. IgE, mast cells, basophils, and eosinophils. J Allergy Clin Immunol 2010; 125(Suppl 2):S73–S80.
Friedlaender MH, Okumoto M, Kelly J. Diagnosis of allergic conjunctivitis. Arch Ophthalmol 1984; 102:1198–1199.
Wohrl S, Vigl K, Zehetmayer S, Hiller R, Jarisch R, Prinz M et al.
The performance of a component-based allergen-microarray in clinical practice. Allergy 2006; 61:633–639.
Demir E, Midyat L, Gulen F, Akbas G, Tanrıverdi S, Tanac R. correlation of serum specific IgE and skin prick tests in children with respiratory allergy. Yeditepe Med J 2011; 5:421–428
Cho JH, Suh JD, Kim JK, Hong SC, Park IH, Lee HM. Correlation between skin-prick testing, individual specific IgE tests, and a multi allergen IgE assay for allergy detection in patients with chronic rhinitis. Am J Rhinol Allergy 2014; 28:388–391.
Nolte H, DuBuske LM. Performance characteristics of a new automated enzyme immunoassay for the measurement of allergen-specific IgE. Summary of the probability outcomes comparing results of allergen skin testing to results obtained with the HYTEC system and CAP system. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol 1997; 79:27–34.
Williams PB, Dolen WK, Koepke JW, Hiller TY. Comparison of skin prick testing and three in vitro assays for specific IgE in the clinical evaluation of immediate hypersensitivity. Ann Allergy 1992; 68:35.
Attia MY, Mohamed HS. Assessment of commercial specific IgE assay for detection of allergens in allergic patients. J Anal Sci Meth Instrum 2013; 3:110–114.
Williams PB, Barnes JH, Szeinbach SL, Sulivan TJ. Analytic precision and accuracy of commercial immunoassays for specific IgE: establishing a standard. J Allergy Clin Immunol 2000; 105:1221–1230.
Popiel J, Cekiera A. Comparison of IgE test results with intradermal skin tests for dust mites and storage mites in atopic dogs. Polish J Veterinary Sciences 2015; 18:351–356.
Heinzerling L, Mari A, Bergmann KC, Bresciani M, Burbach G, Darsow U et al.
The skin prick test – European standards. Clin Transl Allergy 2013; 3:3.
Rao KS, Menon PK, Hilman BC, Sebastian CS, Bairnsfather L. Duration and suppressive effect of tricyclic antidepressants on histamine-induced wheal-and-flare reactions in human skin. J Allergy Clin Immunol 1988; 82:752–757.
Almind M, Dirksen A, Nielsen NH, Svendsen UG. Duration of the inhibitory activity on histamine-induced skin weals of sedative and non-sedative antihistamines. Allergy 1988; 43:593–596.
Hepner MJ, Ownby DR, Anderson JA, Rowe MS, sears-Ewald RD, Brown EB. Risk of systemic reactions in patients taking beta-blocking drugs receiving allergen immunotherapy injections. J Allergy Clin Immunol 1990; 86:407–411.
Schatz M, Hoffman CP, Zeiger RS, Barnes MH. The course of management of asthma and allergic diseases during pregnancy. In: Middleton E Jr, Reed CF, Ellis EF, editors. Allergy: principles and practice. St Louis, MO: CV Mosby Co.; 1988. pp. 1092–1155.
Lockey RF, Benedect LM, Turkeltaub PC, Bukantz SC. Fatalities from immunotherapy (IT) and skin tests (ST). J Allergy Clin Immunol 1987; 79:660–677.
[Figure 1], [Figure 2], [Figure 3], [Figure 4], [Figure 5], [Figure 6]
[Table 1], [Table 2], [Table 3], [Table 4], [Table 5], [Table 6], [Table 7], [Table 8], [Table 9], [Table 10], [Table 11], [Table 12], [Table 13], [Table 14], [Table 15]